Date | Panel | Item | Activity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intellectual disability - microarray and sequencing v3.1580 | SRRM2 |
Konstantinos Varvagiannis changed review comment from: Recent report of 22 unrelated individuals with nonsense / frameshift variants or microdeletions of SRRM2 reported. DD was a universal feature, with ID present in some (16/20 - in all cases mild). Note possible 'overlap' with the study by Kaplanis et al / DDD study cited in the previous review by Prof. Z. Stark. The gene is not intolerant to missense variation (z-score of -6.28) and eventual contribution of missense variants is not known. While SRRM2 is known to encode a splicing factor promoting interaction between mRNA and the spliceosome catalytic machinery (discussed below) molecular and functional studies are required to characterize the pathogenesis of the disorder. There is currently no SRRM2-related phenotype in OMIM. SRRM2 is included in the DD panel of G2P [confidence : definitive, SRRM2-related developmental disorder (monoallelic), cited : Kaplanis et al / DDD]. In PanelApp Australia SRRM2 has amber rating in the ID panel (based on the study by Kaplanis et al / DDD). Consider inclusion with green rating (several individuals/families/variants - rather consistent phenotype) or amber rating (as for pathogenesis / also DD universal feature, ID observed in most but not all affected individuals, when present always mild). ----- Cuinat et al. (2022 - PMID: 35567594) report on 22 individuals with LoF variants in SRRM2. All subjects had DD (22/22) predominantly affecting language acquisition (16/19) while motor delay was less common. ID was present in 16/20 (in all cases mild) of the individuals with available neurocognitive evaluation. Some individuals displayed autistic features (9/22) although others had a friendly - in some cases excessively - sociable personality (8/22). Other features included hypotonia in some, growth abnormalities (12/22 overweight, 7/22 with obesity, 4/22 tall stature). Morphological features incl. facial (20/22 - e.g. deep-set eyes, bulbous nasal tip or smooth philtrum) or small hands and feet (6/22) were also reported. Visceral / skeletal abnormalities were uncommon. SRRM2 encodes serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2 (or SRm300), a nuclear ubiquitous protein forming a complex with the protein encoded by SRRM1 (SRm160). As the authors summarize this complex is one of the main catalytic components of the spliceosome having a role in pre-mRNA maturation. 12 subjects harbored frameshift variants, 8 nonsense while 2 further ones had microdeletions (66-270kb) spanning - but not limited to - SRRM2 (other genes not predicted to be haploinsufficient). The gene has a pLI in gnomAD of 1 (o/e = 0.06) while it appears to be tolerant to missense variation (z-score of -6.28 / o/e = 1.43). With the exception of the 2 subjects harboring a microdeletion, all were investigated with singleton/trio ES with no other candidate variants. Variants occurred de novo in 19/22. Mosaicism (in an asymptomatic parent) was suspected based on the reads in one case. One individual had inherited the variant (parent with DD). Segregation analyses was not possible in one case. While one variant lied in ex2 (of 15) all others were in the large ex11 (encoding ~2000 of the 2752 total residues based on the schema provided / NM_016333.4), all predicted to lead to NMD. There are no studies for pathogenesis of the disorder or the underlying effect of variants. Animal models not discussed. The authors do a comparison with other 'spliceosomopathies', e.g. due to variants in SF3B4 or EFTUD2, where DD/ID can be a feature although these disorders have also prominent skeletal features. Previously, as the authors note, the study by Kaplanis et al (2020 - PMID: 33057194) integrating exome sequence data from ~31,000 parent-offspring trios of individuals with developmental disorders had identified SRRM2 among 28 genes significantly enriched in LoF variants. [ The present study possibly includes individuals from the aforementioned cohort, e.g. from Radboudumc ].; to: Recent report of 22 unrelated individuals with nonsense / frameshift variants or microdeletions of SRRM2. DD was a universal feature, with ID present in some affected individuals (16/20 - in all cases mild). Note possible 'overlap' with the study by Kaplanis et al / DDD study cited in the previous review by Prof. Z. Stark. The gene is not intolerant to missense variation (z-score of -6.28) and eventual contribution of missense variants is not known. While SRRM2 is known to encode a splicing factor promoting interaction between mRNA and the spliceosome catalytic machinery (discussed below) molecular and functional studies are required to characterize the pathogenesis of the disorder. There is currently no SRRM2-related phenotype in OMIM. SRRM2 is included in the DD panel of G2P [confidence : definitive, SRRM2-related developmental disorder (monoallelic), cited : Kaplanis et al / DDD]. In PanelApp Australia SRRM2 has amber rating in the ID panel (based on the study by Kaplanis et al / DDD). Consider inclusion with green rating (several individuals/families/variants - rather consistent phenotype) or amber rating (as for pathogenesis / also DD universal feature, ID observed in most but not all affected individuals, when present always mild). ----- Cuinat et al. (2022 - PMID: 35567594) report on 22 individuals with LoF variants in SRRM2. All subjects had DD (22/22) predominantly affecting language acquisition (16/19) while motor delay was less common. ID was present in 16/20 (in all cases mild) of the individuals with available neurocognitive evaluation. Some individuals displayed autistic features (9/22) although others had a friendly - in some cases excessively - sociable personality (8/22). Other features included hypotonia in some, growth abnormalities (12/22 overweight, 7/22 with obesity, 4/22 tall stature). Morphological features incl. facial (20/22 - e.g. deep-set eyes, bulbous nasal tip or smooth philtrum) or small hands and feet (6/22) were also reported. Visceral / skeletal abnormalities were uncommon. SRRM2 encodes serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 2 (or SRm300), a nuclear ubiquitous protein forming a complex with the protein encoded by SRRM1 (SRm160). As the authors summarize this complex is one of the main catalytic components of the spliceosome having a role in pre-mRNA maturation. 12 subjects harbored frameshift variants, 8 nonsense while 2 further ones had microdeletions (66-270kb) spanning - but not limited to - SRRM2 (other genes not predicted to be haploinsufficient). The gene has a pLI in gnomAD of 1 (o/e = 0.06) while it appears to be tolerant to missense variation (z-score of -6.28 / o/e = 1.43). With the exception of the 2 subjects harboring a microdeletion, all were investigated with singleton/trio ES with no other candidate variants. Variants occurred de novo in 19/22. Mosaicism (in an asymptomatic parent) was suspected based on the reads in one case. One individual had inherited the variant (parent with DD). Segregation analyses was not possible in one case. While one variant lied in ex2 (of 15) all others were in the large ex11 (encoding ~2000 of the 2752 total residues based on the schema provided / NM_016333.4), all predicted to lead to NMD. There are no studies for pathogenesis of the disorder or the underlying effect of variants. Animal models not discussed. The authors do a comparison with other 'spliceosomopathies', e.g. due to variants in SF3B4 or EFTUD2, where DD/ID can be a feature although these disorders have also prominent skeletal features. Previously, as the authors note, the study by Kaplanis et al (2020 - PMID: 33057194) integrating exome sequence data from ~31,000 parent-offspring trios of individuals with developmental disorders had identified SRRM2 among 28 genes significantly enriched in LoF variants. [ The present study possibly includes individuals from the aforementioned cohort, e.g. from Radboudumc ]. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intellectual disability - microarray and sequencing | SF3B4 | Ellen McDonagh classified SF3B4 as Red List (low evidence) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intellectual disability - microarray and sequencing | SF3B4 | BRIDGE consortium edited their review of SF3B4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intellectual disability - microarray and sequencing | SF3B4 | BRIDGE consortium edited their review of SF3B4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intellectual disability - microarray and sequencing | SF3B4 | Louise Daugherty classified SF3B4 as amber | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intellectual disability - microarray and sequencing | SF3B4 | Louise Daugherty commented on SF3B4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intellectual disability - microarray and sequencing | SF3B4 | BRIDGE consortium reviewed SF3B4 |